Some say that islam is just another religion no worse than any other. When islam is criticized, some self-applauding do-gooder will inevitably (and predictably) jump in to rescue to poor defenseless faith of islam by always comparing it with the atrocities done in the name of Christianity.
The difference is that in today’s information age, you don’t see any follower of any faith resorting to violence, either directed by a ruling class or acting as a lone wolf, to score points for a brothel of an afterlife. You couldn’t find anything in the bible instructing it’s mindless puppets to conquer Constantinople and Rome, and the whole world, and submit it to the ruling class of the faith (something which is indeed clearly commanded in islam).
Any violence in history that was done in the name of other religions cannot be clearly traced back to their holy texts (except maybe for the Jews killing Philistines or the Christians to kill witches, but there aren’t many Philistines or witches around these days, are there?). Yet, there will always be infidels of islam, there will always be victimhood claimed for muslims is any form, they will always be offended by infidels who don’t have to follow the commands of islam (Danish cartoons) and so on. Islam is perpetually offended by the existence of infidels, but at the same time needs their existence to demonize them and use them as slaves for the divinely commanded ‘jizya’ tax.
Christianity instructs its puppets to spread the word with missionaries. Islam instructs NOT the spread of the faith, but the submission of unbelievers so that they are reduced to mere slaves to muslim masters. That’s why muslim empires of the past didn’t force or allow conversion to islam; they needed someone to work and produce.Plus, islam allows muslims to pick sex-slaves from the submitted non-muslims. So, islam is a political supremacist ideology, more than a religion.
It’s no excuse that ‘islam is a relatively young religion and hasn’t matured yet’. This is an intellectually dishonest argument. What IS the exact number of centuries that allows the followers of a religion to grow out of its violent elements? In today’s age of information, is this really a valid excuse?
In islam, acts of violence in the name of it CAN BE TRACED DIRECTLY to its holy texts.
There is a fundamental difference in islam. It is not a religion. It is a divinely sanctioned political supremacy which aims at subduing all non-muslims, NOT TO CONVERT THEM, BUT TO ENSLAVE THEM, so that they operate as infidels under the ruling class of muslims, paying the ‘jizya’ tax to Allah’s chosen muslims.
No wonder muslims are so fanatical when it comes to their embarrassing faith. It promises orgies in the afterlife and a ruling class status in this life.
There are no excuses for islam. Anyone identifying themselves with this ideology is no better than a supremacist, and actually by far worse than Nazis, who at least weren’t driven by the promise of a pornographic afterlife. Yes, there are ‘moderate’ muslims, but there are ‘moderate’ Nazis too. The moderates silently/passively observe and sympathize with the ‘extremists’ (who aren’t extremist at all, since they simply follow the clear instructions of islam).
Moderate muslims will make excuses about sharia law (the supremacist state regime under which the world must be submitted), by saying that it’s so fabulous that you can make loans interest free! They fail to mention that homosexuals are killed, theft is punishable by amputation, non-muslims are forced to pay taxes to the muslim ruling class, and so on.
Islam is barbaric. What is more barbaric is seeking identification with it in today’s information age. What is even more barbaric is supposedly ‘civilized’ politically correct social justice warriors making excuses for ‘tolerating’ islam, when in fact they’re advocating tolerating intolerance and supremacy and violence and hate which can be traced directly to the “holy” texts of islam.